May 2020

healthy coconut milk yogurt recipe recette de yogourt santé au lait de coconut

Coconut Yogurt Recipe

It’s perfect. After a few short tries, this formula is perfect for making coconut yogurt from super good probiotics, those from Intelligentlabs Probiotics. 10 specific strains, capsules to pass the first stages in the gut and 50 billion guaranteed after 2 years on the shelves, so they contain 150 billion at the start of their life. These are among the best on the market. By making yogurt with 2 capsules, you can inoculate the next fermentation again with a few spoons of your already made yogurt. All it takes is a yogurt maker; it is much easier and more precise than with the oven light on. Ingredients 1 Liter of coconut milk without sugar (in cardboard because in cane there are always more heavy metals or BPA or BPB) 2 capsules of Intelligent Labs Probiotics 1 tablespoon cane sugar, or coconut to feed the bacteria 1 tablespoon of Xanthan gum to thicken Recipe Combine coconut milk, xanthan gum and sugar in the blender Pour into a pan and heat until slightly boiling. Watch carefully and stop at the first bubbles Pour into the yogurt maker Wait for it to cool down to body temperature, so equal to the finger. Open two probiotic capsules or a few tablespoons of a previous yogurt Wait 8-10h then refrigerate! And There you go Janeck Olczyk, Ostéopathie – Optimum Osteo Montréal

OPTIMUM PROTOCOL - LIVER AND BODY DETOX 1Osteopath, Ostéopathe, Osteopathe, Montreal, Osteo, Osteopathe Montreal, Massage, Deep Tissue, Massothérapie, Osteopath Montreal, Osteopathe Plateau, Plateau, Osteopathy, Osteopathie, Janeck Olczyk


Bienvenue à la zone membre du site Optimum Osteo Cette section fait partie des Protocoles Optimum et est réservée aux membres.  Pour en faire partie, il vous suffit de vous abonner en achetant l’un des protocoles qui vous intéresse.  Chacun des protocoles achetés vous donnera accès à leur lecture complète et vous permettra d’approfondir votre espace bien-être.  Chacun de ceux-ci ont été conçus à partir du fruit de mes recherches et de mes expériences de plus de 15 années dans le domaine de la Santé Holistique et de celui de l’Ostéopathie.  Chacun traite un thème de la santé spécifique et sont conçus pour être vraiment efficaces et faciles à suivre.  Si vous avez des questions, n’hésitez pas à me contacter. Les Protocoles Optimum qui couvrent différentes stratégies sur la santé holistique et l’optimisation de l’hygiène de vie sont maintenant disponibles pour tous!  Découvrez-les!         Welcome to the member area of the Optimum Osteo site This section is part of the Optimum Protocols and is reserved for members. To be part of it, you just need to subscribe by purchasing one of the protocols that interests you. Each of the protocols purchased will give you access to their complete reading and allow you to deepen your wellbeing and upgrade to a new level of health. Each of these were designed from the fruit of my research and my experiences of more than 15 years in the field of Holistic Health and Osteopathy.  They are designed in a way to be ultra efficient and simple to follow.  If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me. The Optimum Protocols which cover different strategies on holistic health and the optimization of healthy lifestyles are available to everyone! Discover them!     Optimum protocol for liver and body detox $10.00 Add to cart

Protection des EMFs et du 5g EMFs and 5g protection

EMFs and 5G – Part 1 – Impacts on human biology and how to protect

Protection against non-natural EMFs and 5G – Part 1 Impacts on the human biology   Within the last hundred years, we have moved into an era where, for the first time, the human and all other living organisms, must adapt to the electromagnetic fields (EMF’s) generated by technology.  EMFs superimpose themselves on the natural electromagnetic fields in which humans have always bathed, the EM field of the Earth, visible light, microcosmic waves coming from , and infrared among others. EMF’s are classified into two parts: ionizing waves (with faster wave cycles like X-rays and Gamma rays) and non-ionizing waves (in the spectrum between radio waves, microwaves, wi-fi, cell waves and other technological devices).  It is common for non-ionizing waves to be defined as safe for humans and not harmful to health, while it is said that ionizing waves cause damage to DNA. We will explore the difference between non-ionizing waves and ionizing waves in further detail, as well as their potential health impacts, in this two-part article Who can we trust? We are already bombed from everywhere in but the upcoming arrival of 5G technology will be a new step in this cycle where pulsed waves will invade our spaces. For now, the previous 2, 3 and 4G technologies use wavelengths up to 4Ghz. 5G technology seems to want to exploit a wavelength of 3.6 Gigahertz at first, but the sex appeal of the bandwidth of 60Ghz is promising for the telecommunications market and that is why the quantum leap in adaptation will still be the most important. In addition, these waves will be combined with those of 2, 3 and 4G and that is why it is important to question their impact on health and the environment. Obviously, scientific studies carried out by telecommunications companies have not been able to detect a danger linked to these waves. The national frequency agencies insist that the acceptable threshold of waves toxicity will not be exceeded either with 5G, cell phones, or relay antennas. These thresholds, which several countries already , are made on the recommendation of the ICNIRP, the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, a commission that seems to care very much for the protection of the population. However, it appears that several members of the board of directors are in a conflict of interest, and that the commission itself was set up by the giants[1]. In the ICNIRP guide of recommendations released for 2020, there are indeed effects of 5G infrastructures on health that are detailed. In particular, cell permeability, as well as a rise in body temperature is discussed, although in relationship to levels of exposure that are much higher than those used by the industry (including that of proposed 5G infrastructure)[2]. However, part of the population worries and requests a moratorium so that real studies are made by uninvolved parties that would be able to confirm or deny the real danger presented by 5G’s frequencies. Some studies already demonstrate neuropsychological effects in humans due to the exposure of technological EMF’s like depression and other neurotransmitter deregulations[3]. More and more independent studies demonstrate the damaging effects on DNA by the activation of free radicals and decline in fertility, specifically in men. It is interesting to note the recent position of Holland on the subject. While the ICNIRP commission has, to many people’s surprise, recently revised the permissible exposure rate for high-voltage lines from 100,000 to 200,000 nanoTesla, Holland has bought back more than 1,300 houses under the lines at high voltages and lowered its recommendations for citizens to place the limit at 400 nanoTesla. This decision was done when a dozen studies demonstrated the links between exposure and an abnormally high rate of childhood leukemia[4]. The arrival of 5G On the other hand, while the entire population is confined to quarantine and social distancing measures affect almost countries, the installation of 5G, considered to be an essential service, is underway. in particular with the authorization from the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) given during the last month to Elon Musk and his Starlink service to build and deploy 1 million relay antennae on the ground. These antennas will send pulsed waves over short distances and must be installed every 100 or 200 meters. According to Martin Pall Ph.D., Professor Emeritus in Biology and Medicine at the University of Washington and EMF researcher, funding for research on EMF’s by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States has been since 1986. Funding granted to the National Health Institute was also cut a few years ago. Can we trust these citizens’ health protection commissions when telecommunications lobbying seems to be taking over? It would seem essential that the moratorium, as well as and requests for studies on the impact of EMF’s on health proposed by more than 170 scientists from 37 countries, are listened to[5]. An open letter to the European Union indicates that the fear of these scientists is towards the technologies, which produce EMF’s, and in particular the arrival of 5G. In this letter, they demonstrate support for a US study carried out by the National Toxicology Program at a cost of 25 million dollars, which illustrates a significant increase in heart and brain cancers in animals exposed to EMF’s well below the thresholds considered . The statement called on medicine to recognize the increasingly common electrohypersensitivity in Europe, which must be treated as a chronic disease in and of which requires prevention and specific care. The World Health Organization (WHO) concludes on it’s website that, after 30 years of research on the subject and more than 25,000 scientific articles, exposure to man-made EMFs below the permitted thresholds is harmless for human health. WHO also denies any link between EMF’s and the neurological disorders explained above[6]. Why 60Ghz? It seems that the 60Ghz band is making great promises in the telecommunications industry for several reasons. Firstly, there is no license required for this band while most of the bands up to 30Ghz are governed by the need